Synthetic Terrain: Electromagnetic Interference and the Engineered Biology Agenda
What if the next pandemic doesn’t come from a bat, chicken, cow, lab, or a “virus” - but from a directed frequency?
This piece marks the beginning of a body of work I intend to spend considerable time on - an overview available publicly, with future reports expanded in depth through the paid subscription. There, I’ll explore projections based on current trends, cultural shifts, emerging technologies, behavioural conditioning and mind control techniques, and structural realignments in dedicated investigative instalments.
To those past and present who have supported me in this work - thank you. Your support, in all its forms, hasn’t gone unnoticed and is genuinely appreciated. Much of what I’ve shared over the years has been done freely - driven by passion rather than recognition - but there are real limits to what can be done alone. Your support really does help more than I can express.
This introductory report outlines a growing body of evidence suggesting that electromagnetic and acoustic technologies - funded and developed by DARPA and affiliated agencies - may shed light on a long-documented category of illness historically linked to electrical exposure. These technologies are not only interacting with biological systems but may be part of a broader agenda to mimic and ultimately replace organic systems. It might sound speculative - even esoteric - but I’ll be drawing from publicly available studies, patents, and field data that ground these claims in fact, not theory. It is critical that more people become aware of what’s unfolding before this agenda gains irreversible traction over our bodies, our families, our animals, and our land.
If you haven’t yet read The Invisible Rainbow by Arthur Firstenberg, I highly recommend it. The book outlines the historical correlation between technological rollouts and disease outbreaks, and it serves as a foundational text for understanding the physiological effects of non-native electromagnetic radiation on humans, animals, and entire ecosystems. I'll be referencing it regularly throughout this series.
While mainstream narratives remain fixated on virology and vaccine debates, a parallel revolution is underway - quietly advancing in the fields of bioelectromagnetics, neuromodulation, and directed-energy systems. These tools - often labelled as non-lethal - are rarely scrutinised in public discourse, despite their capacity to influence health, behaviour, and consciousness. Every day, we see content warning of medical harm, yet few speak to the deeper, possibly more insidious issue that both vaccinated and unvaccinated populations are experiencing similar pathologies.
This topic intersects not only with health, but with the broader strategic narratives where rural decentralisation, food systems, and bioterror simulations appear increasingly coordinated.
A SIMULATION THAT'S NOT REALLY A SIMULATION
In April 2024, the Bipartisan Commission on Biodefense released a document titled The National Blueprint for Biodefense. The report outlines a scenario in which a genetically engineered Nipah virus is released on July 4, 2025, resulting in 280,000 deaths and massive agricultural disruption.
Although framed as a simulation, the report - like 2019’s Event 201 - reads more like strategic pre-positioning. It recommends centralised biodefense command structures, AI-based response tools, and expedited vaccine platforms, under a permanent federal authority housed in the National Security Council.
The document has received minimal public scrutiny, despite calls within it for a complete overhaul of decentralised disease detection systems. Taken together, it raises questions not only about preparedness - but foreknowledge. And perhaps more interestingly, it coincides with the much broader narrative of the clampdown on farming and food autonomy just as rural and regional populations begin to reassert themselves.
I think many of us have certainly noticed that more and more farmers are taking to social media to expose legislative overreach, food supply constraints, and land-use manipulation (Australian example of this), one has to wonder - if something were to happen in this space, the volume of coverage alone could create a seismic ripple through the population. It would be incredibly emotionally charged and deeply destabilising. The puppet masters favourite recipe.
It also fits neatly alongside this current cultural wave of decentralisation with more people moving to rural areas, embracing country life, and rejecting urban hyper-surveillance. But I have often thought this trend is far from organic. Much like the 'Yellowstone effect,' this mass psychological shift toward country life may have been quietly encouraged - through media, narrative, and cultural nostalgia - not simply as a reaction to urban collapse (although perhaps it started off as that), but as part of a larger behavioural conditioning strategy.
After all, if large numbers of people begin relocating to regions later used as the backdrop for a pre-scripted 'bioterror' scenario, what follows can be framed as spontaneous - even blamed on the influx of self-reliant individuals who reject pharmaceutical intervention and favour natural health approaches. This, of course, clashes with the increasingly strict biosecurity measures being rolled out across the country (in Australia, but likely mirrored elsewhere). In reality, such a scenario may be less organic than it appears. A government simulation focused on rural collapse and livestock devastation suggests not only foreknowledge - but a deliberate setup. It signals a narrative redirection and the engineering of a full-spectrum behavioural shift.
Consider the chess moves: promote decentralisation, glorify country living (cue the Yellowstone aesthetic), and stimulate land migration - only to then simulate a biological crisis targeting those exact regions. The narrative practically writes itself. Livestock becomes the carrier, and rural communities are reframed as high-risk zones. Suddenly, those who sought sovereignty and separation from central systems are positioned not just at the epicentre of a new kind of emergency - but potentially as its cause. What makes it worse is the very public, desperate cry of farming families - many unknowingly calling for government intervention in response to engineered crises like droughts and floods. But they may soon wish they’d never asked.
Of course, this has less to do with health and more to do with ultimate control. If the problem is positioned as emerging from the farms and rural areas, the solution becomes obvious: tighter regulation, forced compliance, land acquisition, and a reversion to centralised, industrial food systems. All under the banner of safety - and with it, increasing operational costs, more money spent to meet regulatory requirements, heavier taxes, and an overall economic squeeze that makes independent farming completely unsustainable by design.
TERRAIN THEORY AND THE QUESTION OF FREQUENCY-INDUCED ILLNESS
Many more people are becoming aware of what I think is simply the truth, but what is referred to as Terrain Theory. It challenges the mainstream germ theory by asserting that internal biological terrain - shaped by environmental exposures, toxicity, and stress - is the primary determinant of disease. It also confirms that our bodies, animals, systems, and ecosystems are not broken but are adapting to broken mechanisms and violations of Natural Law - the universal principles observable in nature that govern balance, regeneration, and life itself.
In this context, electromagnetic radiation (EMR) becomes a major variable. Numerous studies have documented physiological responses to EMR exposure, including neurological symptoms, immune dysregulation, and chronic inflammation. I personally think the increase in hormonal and skin issues, itchiness, and cancer in dogs living inside homes is rooted in EMR exposure (read this and this). The same can be said for issues with bee hives, the strange and sudden influx of fire ants - an aggressive, invasive species linked to changes in environmental and electromagnetic conditions - and horses showing escalating physiological problems - yet no one seems to be examining the terrain or environment.
What the world experienced during COVID-19 was the result of a viral pathogen (which don’t exist). It was the interaction between biology and an increasingly irradiated environment, rolled out in step with 5G infrastructure and other environmental stressors. I dive deeper into this, and my own personal experience, in a Non-Native EMF, Bioelectric Fields & Natural Intelligence Webinar, available soon through the paid section of my Substack. For now, you can access it now here.
The terrain itself is being destabilised through sustained, low-grade exposure to frequency-based interference. Our biological equilibrium is sensitive to environmental shifts, and the technologies that now define that environment must be seen as active agents in the disease process.
This brings us back to the broader choreography described in the previous section: a reorientation of country life, food systems, and perception itself. Frequency, when used strategically, doesn’t just disrupt health - it conditions the terrain, creates illness patterns, and most importantly, erases clear lines of causality. In the vacuum left by that uncertainty, entire entire populations can be redirected, regulated, and redefined - held at the mercy of those who understand the game and are actively running it.
DARPA’S EXPERIMENTS IN FREQUENCY-BASED BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
RadioBio (2017–2020) - DARPA’s RadioBio program investigated whether living cells communicate using electromagnetic signals. The agency funded efforts to detect GHz-range emissions from E. coli and to understand whether such emissions could be harnessed or interrupted. This project showed that biological systems aren't just mechanical - they're interactive fields. If our rhythms, our equilibrium, rely on subtle electromagnetic signals to stay intact, then outside signals can override, distort, or actually knock that system out entirely.
If this is the case, then biology - ours, animals, even entire ecosystems - can be externally influenced or pushed off balance without touching anything physically (all I can think of is The Sims video game as I write this). We’re talking about the capacity to interfere with natural processes from a distance, through infrastructure that has literally been installed on every section of the earth where there are people.
The implications of this technology are greater than most people realise. It could be used to destabilise the health of entire regions - not just by weakening the immune system, but by disrupting sleep, exhausting populations, and interfering with emotional regulation with increased irritability, obedience, volatility, and illness.
Beyond physical health, it has the potential to influence thoughts, behaviours, and emotional reactivity - amplifying fear, confusion, or submission. There’s also a growing need to examine its possible role in the rise of erratic and violent behaviour. In the webinar I referenced earlier, I also share my theories on how these technologies might not only activate dormant conditions, but potentially create entirely new ones in the body.
ElectRx (Electrical Prescriptions) - This one came through the BRAIN Initiative and focused on replacing pharmaceuticals with frequency-based interventions. One of the big developments was something called 'neural dust' - tiny implants powered by ultrasound that can monitor and tweak nerve activity in real time. The population is already being primed through the rising interest in red light therapy, bio-resonance, homeopathy, and other frequency-based alternatives. So this kind of intervention will no doubt be packaged as a progressive (maybe even natural/holistic..?!) innovation. But underneath the presentation I think it is very clear what it is. We’re talking about artificial systems that influence the body from the outside in, using invisible signals.
These implants - some as small as a grain of sand - can be injected into the body and wirelessly activated to interact with the nervous system. They’re being framed as tools to regulate inflammation or restore balance to damaged nerve circuits. But once the tech is there, the function can shift. If something can regulate you, it can also dysregulate you. If it can calm a nerve, it can agitate it. If it can monitor feedback loops from inside your body, it becomes a live feed of your internal state - an open channel for behavioural programming. All of this bypasses the body’s natural biofield - its subtle electromagnetic system of communication - and introduces artificial signals that can interfere directly with cellular function.
It’s not far-fetched to imagine this being used to adjust mood, suppress anger (clearly warranted anger when speaking about some of these topics!) or motivation, influence decision-making, or flag deviations from a programmed baseline. However, this isn’t happening through implants alone, it is also through broader system they’re connected to. The body becomes a node in a wireless feedback network - a true mimic of the natural ecosystem.
N³ Program (Next-Generation Non-Surgical Neurotechnology), another DARPA program run under the Biological Technologies Office (BTO), pushed the agenda even further - funding technology that can wirelessly read from and write to the brain without surgery. It uses magnetic fields, focused ultrasound, and light-based stimulation to achieve this kind of access. Publicly, it’s framed as a tool for giving military personnel a cognitive edge - faster reaction times, better focus, more efficient neural processing. However, it is actually about directly interfacing with human thought - without consent, awareness, and any surgical procedure.
This is where the real transhumanist agenda really shows its face. It's about merging biological systems with technological infrastructure and tuning human thought into a live-feedback system. Behaviour, cognition, and nervous system response can be tracked, interpreted, and altered from a distance. The same way terrain can be shaped for farming or mining, the human mind is now being positioned as programmable ground.
Think about what this means in practice - real-time access to emotional states, impulses, reaction thresholds. All of it mapped, activated, altered. This is the kind of infrastructure that could redirect a protest before it begins, neutralise unrest, or flag and suppress individuals whose behaviour falls outside a pre-defined range of acceptability. All these programs make one thing very, very clear…that the game has moved inside the body and the tools being used are increasingly targeted, and invisible.
DIRECTED ENERGY AND THE MICROWAVE AUDITORY EFFECT
The thing is, the use of directed energy as a psychological and biological weapon isn’t actually theoretical at all. While I throw the word theory this and theory that around, really, I know what I am sharing here is the truth. All of this has been actively developed and tested since the Cold War and there is that much public information out there now it cannot even be denied.
One of the earliest breakthroughs came with the Frey Effect in 1961. Scientists discovered that pulsed microwave radiation could cause auditory sensations in the human brain - without any actual sound. Microwave signals essentially were bypassing the ears and directly activating the auditory cortex. You don’t hear it with your ears - you hear it inside your head.
From there, it obviously evolved. Military operations reportedly used microwave projection to influence enemy combatants. The so-called “Voice of God” weapon, allegedly used in Iraq, was said to project messages or commands directly into the minds of soldiers, sowing confusion or inducing psychological breakdowns.
Today, these technologies haven’t gone away. They’ve just become more refined, more targeted, and harder to trace. I’ve long held the belief that this same class of tech may have been quietly used to steer mass psychological movements - particularly around these sudden religious awakenings and the rapid spread of come to Jesus moments. But, again, that’s a topic for another day.
The WADEN program - Waveform Agile Directed Energy Network - continues to explore high-powered microwave systems, officially to disable electronics. But in reality it’s probing how these same frequencies can interact with biological systems. At this level, the line between crowd control and direct biological disruption becomes extremely thin.
We’re talking about targeted bursts of energy that can cause disorientation, nausea, muscle weakness, or mental confusion - without visible injury. Some of you may remember the Canberra protests in 2022 where several demonstrators reported sudden, intense symptoms including headaches, nausea, dizziness, and in some cases, unusual inflammation. Images and firsthand accounts circulated on social media showing severe skin irritation and severe discomfort that many believed were linked to the use of directed energy weapons or active denial systems. Of course, none of this was officially acknowledged. But the symptoms mirrored precisely what’s documented in military manuals for non-lethal directed energy applications. These effects are difficult to trace and nearly impossible to prove after the fact. Which makes them an ideal tool for covert intervention.
This isn’t the future though. These are real, operational systems that are in use already. Much like the other DARPA-backed programs, they point to a deeper shift in strategy - from targeting the external world to targeting internal perception, emotion, and behaviour. With directed energy, you don’t need permission, proximity, or a public reason. All you need is access to the signal.
REFRAMING THE PANDEMIC THROUGH THE LENS OF INFRASTRUCTURE
If frequency-induced symptoms can mimic those of viral illness, then the presence of new network rollouts, satellite arrays, and densified urban EM exposure must be considered as potential co-factors in population-level health shifts. This includes the rapid global deployment of 5G infrastructure in early 2020 - timed in eerie parallel with the first COVID-19 lockdowns - and the increased reliance on wireless saturation in public spaces, homes, schools, and hospitals.
We now know that electromagnetic fields can interfere with cellular processes, immune responses, and neurological regulation. These effects are well-documented and long-observed. And yet, they’re still treated as fringe concerns in mainstream health discourse. Instead, fatigue, inflammation, neurological decline, and cardiovascular incidents are now conveniently attributed to “long COVID” or ever-mutating variants - vague, unprovable placeholders that divert scrutiny from environmental triggers and shift blame back onto the individual body.
What we’re seeing isn’t just a failure of public health or even, in my opinion, the result of vaccinations - it’s a coordinated deflection. A refusal to acknowledge the role of this new infrastructure in generating symptoms, destabilising the terrain, and making populations more dependent on the system. If the public can be convinced it’s all viral, then the networks, towers, and military-grade tech embedded in our everyday environment remain above suspicion.
In light of everything covered so far - RadioBio’s cellular signal research, ElectRx’s remote neural modulation, N³’s brain-interface systems, and WADEN’s energy-based disruption - the pandemic begins to look less like a spontaneous outbreak and more like a layered operation. One that is bound for a repeat run.
THE SIGNAL DROPPED. WHY?
Anecdotal reports I’ve received in Australia suggest that clusters of unusual illness, brain fog, neurological inflammation, and chronic fatigue have actually waned in certain areas - without medical explanation and without any obvious change in routine, location, or exposure…so what changed?
Have we adapted to a new baseline frequency? Have the systems reached a more chronic, low-grade activation mode that no longer causes acute distress but keeps the body and mind in a managed state of low energy, irritability, or compliance (in my opinion, this is most probable - almost everyone has gone quite and “back to normal”)? Or was this a deliberate trial window - an experimental rollout to observe response thresholds?
If the terrain is being influenced remotely - via electromagnetic infrastructure or directed energy fields - then any drop in these symptoms could reflect a pause in signal transmission, a reconfiguration of tactics, or simply a testing phase that’s moved to the next level. The kind of signals used in these operations can be tightly geofenced, time-locked, and frequency-tuned to affect specific targets - without any physical trace.
So were these symptoms part of a test run? A behavioural study in real time? Were emotional responses, compliance levels, and public health narratives being calibrated and mapped through a live-feedback system - one that included social media, biometric data, and on-the-ground surveillance? The tools are already in place - frequency-tuned towers, satellites, drone-based emitters, waveform-adaptive networks - all backed by the data infrastructure to monitor, interpret, and adjust the signal. All currently operational.
And now, with the July 4th, 2025 “bioterror simulation” on record - featuring a high-fatality virus, mass livestock death, and centralised AI-commanded response - it’s difficult not to see continuity in the script. Especially if that ‘virus’ is less a pathogen and more an activation. A trigger that they can activate at any time. Something that doesn’t require human-to-human spread, but simply the right atmospheric conditions, narrative framing, and infrastructure to deliver it.
THIS REALLY ISN’T A THEORY
This investigation presents an alternative hypothesis: that electromagnetic and acoustic infrastructure may play a role in physiological disruption, and that the current public health narrative functions as a smokescreen.
The technologies described here are not speculative. They are DARPA-funded, peer-reviewed, and in many cases, already embedded in civilian and military infrastructure. Programs like RadioBio, ElectRx, and N³ were state-backed ventures into how to read, modulate, and influence biology without surgical intervention or pharmaceutical dependence.
The line between health, surveillance, and behavioural conditioning has been quietly dissolved. Wireless communication is no longer just about internet access. It is about access to you. Not just your data - but your cells, your rhythms, your thoughts, and your reactions.
The question is no longer whether remote biological modulation is possible. It is whether it has already become standard practice - tested, fine-tuned, and deployed under the guise of pandemic response, national security, or medical progress. The redefinition of illness, the rollout of new behavioural frameworks, the erosion of bodily autonomy - they all follow the same logic - frequency as infrastructure, illness as effect, compliance as outcome.
This is really not a theory at all. It is well documented and it is already operationalised across public and private sectors. The only variable now is whether we recognise what’s happening - and what we do about it.